ECO-005Original abstract verified
Fly reproduction and exposure intensity windows
The reported finding
Discovery dossier reports reduced reproduction and gonadal cell death across selected handset-exposure conditions.
Reading it carefully
A retrieval entry, not a verified ecological causal conclusion.
Inside the study
Exposure conditions
See original source for calibrated field and modulation conditions.
Design & controls
Observational or experimental ecology; original methods pending.
Related research & shared cohorts
Athens Panagopoulos/Chavdoula/Margaritis programme. Companion intensity-window paper 10.3109/09553000903567979 is related research and has a separate September 2010 erratum; do not conflate notices.
The protection question raised
Do the original exposure conditions and analyses support the reported fly reproductive effects? Methods remain to be checked, and the figure-label correction belongs with any interpretation of this retrieval lead.
Source verification
Original PubMed abstract and complete publisher erratum reviewed; full main-study methods still outstanding.
Where to find the result
Original abstract; erratum p612/Figure 5 c.
Editorial notices
Publisher erratum 1July 2010, DOI10.3109/09553002.2010.497612, corrects incompletely labelled Figure 5 c; original online figure corrected. This is a figure-label correction,not a retraction.
Funding
Not established from retrieved material.
Conflicts of interest
Not established from retrieved material.
Original publication
Panagopoulos DJ, Chavdoula ED, Margaritis LH. Bioeffects of mobile telephony radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 2010;86(5):345-357. doi:10.3109/09553000903567961.