Homing ability of exposed honey bees
The reported finding
Long-term return 78.6% exposed versus 95.2% control, GLMM P=.0064; return time nonsignificant. Short-term 40 min return 90.0% versus 86.6%, P=.4696. Brood development and overall 28-day survival were not significantly different (survival Log-Rank P=.102). A partial day 11-29 foraging-age-window survival analysis differed (Wilcoxon P=.042; exposed n=280, control n=217).
Reading it carefully
Fitness-related field endpoint with engineered signal; 100% duty is not all typical Wi-Fi. Exposure geometry confounded with location; observer blinding unestablished; independent replication absent. The partial survival-window result is exploratory and does not establish a shortened overall lifespan. No inference of colony collapse, human risk or cellular 5G effects.
Inside the study
Exposure conditions
Design & controls
Related research & shared cohorts
The protection question raised
Source verification
Where to find the result
Editorial notices
Funding
Conflicts of interest
Original publication
Treder M,Müller M,Fellner L,Traynor K,Rosenkranz P. Defined exposure of honey bee colonies to simulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields(RF-EMF): Negative effects on the homing ability,but not on brood development or longevity. Science of the Total Environment.2023;896:165211. DOI10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165211.