REV-036 / Secondary risk analysis

Reanalysing animal data to propose lower RF exposure limits

Melnick et al. · 2026 · Environmental health : a global access science source

What this paper brings together

Reanalyses experimental animal cancer data using benchmark doses and low-dose extrapolation, and applies uncertainty factors to reproductive-toxicity findings.

The authors’ synthesis or proposal

Melnick, Moskowitz and ICBE-EMF derive proposed whole-body limits below current limits, linking their argument to a specified cancer-risk target and assumptions about daily exposure duration.

Reading the connections carefully

This is secondary modelling, not new exposure evidence. Numerical limits depend on animal-to-human extrapolation, linear low-dose assumptions, risk targets and uncertainty factors. They are proposed values, not measured human disease thresholds; the 2026 animal-review corrigendum should be read alongside.

Find related papers

Radiofrequency ↗

Study records to read alongside

These are topical connections within this library. A link does not mean the review cited this particular paper or independently confirmed its result.

Original paper

Ronald L Melnick; Joel M Moskowitz; International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF). Exposure limits to radiofrequency EMF do not account for cancer risk or reproductive toxicity assessed from data in experimental animals. Environmental health : a global access science source. 2026. doi:10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6.

Authors: Ronald L Melnick; Joel M Moskowitz; International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF)